| All Categories |
Primers
VPN, Firewall, Security ... |
Guides
HowTo, Choosing a VPN ... |
Reference
Articles, FAQs, Whitepapers ... |
Standards
Architectures, Protocols ... |
Downloads
VPN, Firewall, Security ... |
Products & Services
Hardware, Software, Services |
| Organizations |
Business
Market Research, Law ... |
| Forums |
News
Archive, Events, Newsletters ... |
|
|
| |
| VPN labs is an open community for researching, testing, reviewing, and discussing Virtual Private Networks. Get trusted, unbiased advice on just about everything related to VPN. For more detail check: How to use this site. VPN Labs - VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS - Free VPN Software and Virtual Private Network News. |
|
|
|
|
| Dr. VPNlabs Question (Archived) |
| Endi Cimety |
posted: 2001-12-25 03:34:00
To whom it may concern,
I am trying to find
a table that contains the comparision of the
Cisco, CheckPoint and Nortel VPN solutions for
enterprises.
Moreover, does the checkpoint
is a suitable VPN solution for user based
authentication and encryption automations. As far
as I know CheckPoint uses IP address for
establishing secure connection between the center
and the user computers. At that point because the
checkpoint does not have Java Applet and client
for communication, it does not fit all the
requirements for a user based secure connections.
And it does not making digital signatures.
Addition to above remarks, because
Checkpoint, Cisco and other VPN uses IP address
and TCP they changes the headers of the messages.
So it will become less efficient
system.
Are these informations true, if not
please send me a detailed information about user
based secure connections. |
|
